Solo
FreeFor personal use and independent side projects.
- Supported-client history
- Managed supported sessions
- Shadow recommendations
- Evidence-dependent verification
- Personal session and economics visibility
Intelligence Control Plane for coding agents
Frontier intelligence, only when the work requires it.
Keep using the coding agents you already use. Taksim governs engineering intelligence across local, private, and cloud resources, keeps the quality bar, verifies outcomes with engineering evidence, and uses stronger intelligence only when necessary.
Free for personal and independent side projects. Company or client work requires Team.
Claude CodeManaged + history
CodexManaged + history
DevinManaged + history
GitHub CopilotHistory visibility
TAKSIMControl plane
PolicyQualityBudgetPrivacyEvidence
LocalPrivateCloudNative planners
Engineering outcomeVerified with evidence
Taksim in action
One native workflow. A clearer engineering outcome.
$ taksim claude
› Fix the failing payment tests and simplify the retry logic.
Observing task and policy envelope…
Build passed
Tests passed
SESSION RECEIPTVERIFIED
- Policy scope
- Allowed
- Quality requirement
- High
- Selection authority
- Taksim
- Verification evidence
- Build · Tests · Checks
Estimated cost avoided$3.82vs frontier-only47%
Illustrative example
Why Taksim
Model selection is only one decision. Engineering outcomes are what matter.
Taksim controls the organisational boundary around intelligence: what is allowed, what quality is required, where planning authority belongs, and what evidence proves the result.
- 01
Observe
Understand usage and workload without retaining raw engineering content in canonical telemetry.
- 02
Govern
Apply company, repository, quality, privacy, and budget constraints.
- 03
Select or delegate
Choose an eligible resource, or let an approved runtime plan internally.
- 04
Verify
Judge engineering success using evidence, not model claims.
- 05
Escalate
Use stronger intelligence or human review when the evidence requires it.
- 06
Learn
Improve future organisational decisions from verified outcomes.
Quality before cost
Keep the quality bar. Change what you pay to reach it.
Taksim optimises inside the quality constraint. It can select an eligible resource directly or delegate execution planning to a runtime that can do it better.
Required qualityHIGH
Private resourceEligible
Provider-native plannerEligible
Local resource CInsufficient
Cost is considered only after capability and policy eligibility.
Across your tools
One control plane. Keep the clients your developers already use.
Client independence does not mean identical integration depth. Taksim states exactly what it can observe and manage for each client.
Claude Code
Managed + history
Codex
Managed + history
Devin
Managed + history
GitHub Copilot
History visibility
Governed delegation
Use provider-native intelligence. Don’t surrender organisational control.
Provider-native planners can be excellent inside a request. Taksim governs the larger boundary: which runtimes are eligible, what they may spend, which policies apply, and whether the outcome is acceptable.
POLICYPRIVACYBUDGETQUALITY
Taksim governance envelopeApproved native plannerInternal plan remains provider-owned
↳ Evidence returns for verification
Privacy by architecture
Prompt-aware. Not prompt-owning.
Taksim derives useful intelligence metadata without making raw engineering content part of canonical telemetry.
Canonical telemetry may retain
- Structural task and session metadata
- Resource attribution when observable
- Token and latency signals
- Verification outcomes
- Finite evidence classifications
Canonical telemetry does not retain
- Raw prompts or model responses
- Source code or diffs
- Credentials
- Raw tool payloads
- Invented provider identity
Start with what you have